The Nature of Atonement and Its Soteriological Implications in Arminian Theology

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

e-journal

The Nature of Atonement and Its Soteriological Implications in Arminian Theology

Pinson, J. Matthew - Nama Orang;

The Calvinist theologian Robert L. Reymond is representative of most Calvinists when he says that the Arminian theory of atonement is the governmental theory. He remarks that the governmental theory “denies that Christ’s death was intended to pay the penalty for sin” and claims that its “germinal teachings are in Arminius.”1 This opinion, however, is not unique to Calvinists. The Wesleyan scholar James K. Grider, in his article on “Arminianism” in the Evangelical Dictionary ofTheology says, “A spillover from Calvinism into Arminianism has occurred in recent decades. Thus, many Arminians whose theology is not very precise say that Christ paid the penalty for our sins. Yet such a view is foreign to Arminianism.”

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan STTRII (Online) Online

e00989

Tersedia

Informasi Detail

Judul Seri: -
No. Panggil: Online
Penerbit: : ., 2021
Deskripsi Fisik: 23 P.
Bahasa: English
ISBN/ISSN: -
Klasifikasi: NONE
Tipe Isi: text
Tipe Media: electronic
Tipe Pembawa: online resource
Edisi: 18/2
Subjek: -
Info Detail Spesifik: -
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab: Pinson, J. Matthew

Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas

Harap masuk untuk melihat lampiran

Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar